When calculating the surface free
energy of a solid from contact angle measurements, the Owens-Wendt (OWRK)
method and the Acid-Base (or van Oss-Chaudhury-Good, vOCG) method
are two of the most commonly employed approaches. Both methods are
included in ramé-hart's DROPimage Pro and DROPimage Advanced
software packages. While both methods aim to provide insight into
surface interactions, they differ significantly in their underlying
assumptions and the components they resolve.
Owens-Wendt (OWRK) Method
The OWRK method posits that the
total surface energy of a solid can be additively separated into two
components: a dispersive
component and a
polar component
- Dispersive Component:
Represents the contribution from London dispersion forces (van
der Waals forces), which are universally present in all
materials.
- Polar Component:
Encompasses all other types of molecular interactions, including
dipole-dipole interactions, hydrogen bonding, and inductive
forces.
The OWRK method typically uses the
geometric mean for combining rules to describe the interactions
between the solid and probe liquid. While the geometric mean method
is most common, the harmonic mean method (Wu method) is optimized
for low-energy polymers.
Both the OWRK and Wu methods
require contact angle measurements with at least two different probe
liquids with known dispersive and polar components (e.g., a polar
liquid like water and a non-polar liquid like diiodomethane). In
both DROPimage Pro and Advanced, the Tool is the same but the user
can choose "geometric" for the OWRK method or "harmonic" for the WU
method.1
Pros of Owens-Wendt:
- Simplicity and Wide
Acceptance: It's conceptually straightforward and
mathematically less complex than the Acid-Base method, making it
widely adopted for routine analysis.
- Good for General
Wettability: Provides a good general understanding of a
surface's wettability by separating universal van der Waals
interactions from more specific polar interactions.
- Sufficient for Many
Engineering Applications: Often sufficient for assessing
surface treatments, coating adhesion on many polymers, and
general material characterization where a detailed understanding
of specific acid-base interactions is not critical.
Cons of Owens-Wendt:
- Limited Detail of Polar
Interactions: The primary drawback is that it lumps all
non-dispersive interactions into a single "polar" component. It
does not differentiate between electron-donating (basic) and
electron-accepting (acidic) characteristics of a surface.
- Potential for Misleading
Results: For surfaces where specific acid-base interactions
are dominant (e.g., biological materials, certain minerals, or
some highly functionalized polymers), the single polar component
can be an oversimplification and may not accurately predict
adhesion or other interfacial phenomena.
- Can Yield Negative
Components: In some cases, particularly with certain liquid
combinations or highly unusual surfaces, the calculation can
theoretically result in negative polar components, which lack
physical meaning.

ramé-hart Model 260 Contact
Angle Goniometer / Tensiometer with DROPimage Advanced Software (p/n
260-U4)
Acid-Base (van Oss-Chaudhury-Good
or vOCG) Method
The Acid-Base method provides a
more detailed breakdown of the surface energy. It divides the total
surface energy into three components:
- Lifshtiz-van der Waals
Components: Equivalent to the dispersive component in OWRK,
accounting for non-polar interactions (London dispersion, Keesom,
Debye forces) but also requires more work as three liquids are
necessary.
- Electron-Acceptor (Acidic)
Component: Represents
the ability of the surface to accept electrons (act as a Lewis
acid).
- Electron-Donor (Basic)
Component: Represents
the ability of the surface to donate electrons (act as a Lewis
base).
The Acid-Base method uses a
different combining rule for the acid-base interactions and
typically requires contact angle measurements with at least three
probe liquids: one non-polar liquid (to determine the LW component)
and two polar liquids, one predominantly acidic and one
predominantly basic, with known components.
Pros of Acid-Base:
- Detailed Interaction
Insight: Provides a more comprehensive understanding of
surface chemistry by resolving specific acid-base interactions.
This is important for systems where hydrogen bonding and
electron transfer play key roles.
- Better for Biological and
Complex Systems: Highly valuable in fields like
biomaterials, pharmaceuticals, and colloid science, where
specific acid-base interactions govern adhesion, protein
adsorption, and cell-surface interactions.
- Improved Predictive Power:
Often offers better predictive power for adhesion,
biocompatibility, and wetting behavior in systems dominated by
polar and acid-base interactions.
- Avoids Negative Components:
Generally less prone to yielding non-physical negative
components compared to OWRK, as it explicitly accounts for the
electron-donor and electron-acceptor nature.
Cons of Acid-Base:
- Increased Complexity:
The theoretical framework and calculations are more complex than
OWRK, requiring more probe liquids and a deeper understanding of
the method.
- Dependency on Liquid
Selection: The accuracy of the results heavily relies on the
precise characterization of the probe liquids' acid-base
components, which can sometimes be debated or less precisely
known.
- Interpretation Challenges:
Interpreting the individualalues and their implications requires
more specialized knowledge.
Conclusion:
The choice between Owens-Wendt and
the Acid-Base method depends on the specific research question and
the nature of the materials being investigated.
- Use Owens-Wendt for a
general assessment of wettability, particularly for moderately
polar or non-polar surfaces, and when a simpler, quicker
analysis is preferred. It's often sufficient for many industrial
quality control and process optimization tasks.
- Opt for the Acid-Base
method when a detailed understanding of specific acid-base
interactions, hydrogen bonding, and electron transfer
capabilities of the surface is critical, especially in fields
like biomaterials, adhesion science, and pharmaceuticals, where
these interactions dictate material performance.
Notes
1 Both the OWRK and Wu methods are integrated in the
Two-Liquid Surface Energy Tool in ramé-hart DROPimage Pro and
DROPimage Advanced software packages.
|
The
ramé-hart
Model 260 Goniometer/Tensiometer (see image above) offers scientists
and researchers a robust platform for advanced surface and interfacial
analysis. This tool is driven by ramé-hart's powerful
DROPimage
Advanced software.
Distinguishing itself with an Advanced 3-axis Stage, the Model 260
provides precise sample positioning and, critically, supports optional
environmental accessories like the
Environmental Chamber for temperature-controlled studies, expanding
experimental capabilities.
Coupled with a U4 Series SuperSpeed digital camera capturing up to 520
frames/second, the system delivers exceptional image quality for dynamic
measurements, while the included DROPimage Advanced software provides a
comprehensive suite of tools for contact angle, surface/interfacial
tension, and surface energy calculations (including both the OWRK, Wu,
and Acid-Base, or vOCG methods detailed in the article above)
complete with methods-based experiment design for automated, repeatable,
and powerful surface research.
Interested in a Model 260? Feel free to
contact
us today for a no-obligation quotation for this tool or any other ramé-hart
instrument model. |